4.6 Article

Lignin-Inspired Polymers with High Glass Transition Temperature and Solvent Resistance from 4-Hydroxybenzonitrile, Vanillonitrile, and Syringonitrile Methacrylates

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 9, 期 50, 页码 16874-16880

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c07048

关键词

Vanillin; Syringaldehyde; Lignocellulose; Biobased plastics; Copolymers; Acrylate polymers; Glass transition temperature

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund through the Mobilitas Pluss Top Researcher Grant programme [MOBTT21]
  2. Crafoord Foundation [20190530]
  3. Swedish Research Council Formas [2016-00468]
  4. Formas [2016-00468] Funding Source: Formas
  5. Vinnova [2016-00468] Funding Source: Vinnova

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study discusses the synthesis and polymerization of nitrile-containing methacrylate monomers derived from lignin-inspired aldehydes. The resulting polymethacrylates show high T-g values and thermal stability, making them suitable for producing materials with tunable T-g values and enhanced solvent resistance. Using lignin-derived nitrile-containing monomers is an efficient strategy for producing well-defined biobased high T-g polymer materials.
We here report on the synthesis and polymerization of nitrile-containing methacrylate monomers, prepared via straightforward nitrilation of the corresponding lignin-inspired aldehyde. The polymethacrylates reached exceptionally high glass transition temperatures (T-g values), i.e., 150, 164, and 238 degrees C for the 4-hydroxybenzonitrile, vanillonitrile, and syringonitrile derivatives, respectively, and were thermally stable up to above 300 degrees C. Copolymerizations of the nitrile monomers with styrene and methyl methacrylate, respectively, gave potentially melt processable materials with tunable T-g values and enhanced solvent resistance. The use of lignin-derived nitrile-containing monomers represents an efficient strategy toward well-defined biobased high T-g polymer materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据