4.6 Article

Interception and Redistribution of Precipitation by Parkinsonia aculeata L.: Implications for Palo Verde National Park Wetlands, Costa Rica

期刊

WATER
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w14030311

关键词

interception; canopy; dry forest; seasonal wetland; Central America

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seasonal wetlands in the tropics serve as important habitats for bird species. Palo Verde National Park in Costa Rica has one of the most significant wetlands in Central America. The invasive plant species Parkinsonia aculeata L. has impacted both bird habitats and wetland hydrology.
Seasonal wetlands in the tropics are important habitats for local and migratory bird species. In the northwestern Pacific of Costa Rica, Palo Verde National Park has one of the most important seasonal wetlands of Central America. The management history of this wetland has shown the impact of invasive plant species such as Parkinsonia aculeata L. whose cover extension and canopy structure impact not only the ecological niches of bird species, but also the wetland hydrology. A 300 m(2) plot was established in a P. aculeata stand to evaluate the role of P. aculeata on the partitioning and redistribution of precipitation. Gross precipitation (P-Gr), throughfall (P-TF) and stemflow (P-SF) were measured on a daily basis to determine the interception of precipitation (P-I) and net precipitation (P-Net). A total of 43 precipitation events were sampled during the wet season of 2003. We measured 530.5 mm of P-Gr and 458 mm of P-TF, with an average sampling error of 0.7 mm or 6.1%. Canopy storage capacity was estimated at 1.47 mm, throughfall 88.73%, stem flow 2.63% and a total interception of 8.64%, with a P-Net coefficient of 0.9475. The relationships between gross precipitation (P-Gr) with throughfall (P-TF), stemflow (P-SF) and net precipitation (P-Net) were evaluated using linear regression models. P. aculeata showed to have one of the highest net precipitation and lowest precipitation interception among small trees.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据