4.6 Article

Modelling the Impact of Vegetation Change on Hydrological Processes in Bayin River Basin, Northwest China

期刊

WATER
卷 13, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w13192787

关键词

revegetation; irrigation; leaf area index; evapotranspiration; groundwater

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41801094]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Qinghai Province, China [2021-ZJ-705]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study in the middle and lower reaches of the Bayin River basin in China aimed to accurately model the impact of vegetation change on hydrological processes during regional revegetation. The LU-SWAT-MODFLOW model outperformed the original SWAT-MODFLOW model in simulating the impact of human activity, evapotranspiration, and groundwater recharge, showing significant changes in surface-water-groundwater exchange after regional revegetation.
Vegetation change in arid areas may lead to the redistribution of regional water resources, which can intensify the competition between ecosystems and humans for water resources. This study aimed to accurately model the impact of vegetation change on hydrological processes in an arid endorheic river watershed undergoing revegetation, namely, the middle and lower reaches of the Bayin River basin, China. A LU-SWAT-MODFLOW model was developed by integrating dynamic hydrological response units with a coupled SWAT-MODFLOW model, which can reflect actual land cover changes in the basin. The LU-SWAT-MODFLOW model outperformed the original SWAT-MODFLOW model in simulating the impact of human activity as well as the leaf area index, evapotranspiration, and groundwater table depth. After regional revegetation, evapotranspiration and groundwater recharge in different sub-basins increased significantly. In addition, the direction and amount of surface-water-groundwater exchange changed considerably in areas where revegetation involved converting low-coverage grassland and bare land to forestland.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据