4.7 Article

The Responsiveness of Bee Venom Phospholipase A2 on Regulatory T Cells Correlates with the CD11c+CD206+Population in Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells

期刊

TOXINS
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins13100717

关键词

regulatory T cell (Treg); bee venom phospholipase A2 (bvPLA2); human peripheral blood mononuclear cell (hPBMC); CD206; mannose receptor

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea - Korea government [NRF 2020RIA2B5B03002164]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that bee venom phospholipase A2 can increase the proportion of regulatory T cells in the peripheral blood of healthy individuals. Additionally, the number of CD206(+) DCs may predict individual responses to bee venom phospholipase A2.
Bee venom phospholipase A2 (bvPLA2) has been reported to have therapeutic effects such as neuroprotection, anti-inflammation, anti-nociception, anti-cancer properties, caused by increasing regulatory T cells (Tregs). The mechanism of Tregs modulation by bvPLA2 has been demonstrated by binding with the mannose receptor, CD206 in experimental models of several diseases. However, it remains unknown whether this mechanism can also be applied in human blood. In this study, we collected peripheral blood samples from healthy donors and analyzed the percentages of monocyte-derived dendritic cells with CD206 (CD206(+) DCs) before expansion, the proportion of Tregs, and the subpopulations after expansion treated with bvPLA2 or PBS using flow cytometry and the correlations among them. The percentage of Tregs tended to be higher in the bvPLA2 group than in the control group. There were significant positive correlations between the CD206 population in hPBMC and the proportions of Tregs treated with bvPLA2, especially in the Treg fold change comparing the increase ratio of Tregs in bvPLA2 and in PBS. These findings indicate that bvPLA2 increased the proportion of Tregs in healthy human peripheral blood and the number of CD206(+) DCs could be a predictor of the bvPLA2 response of different individuals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据