A Comparative Analysis of Unmanned Aircraft Systems in Low Altitude Photogrammetric Surveys

Comparing photogrammetric performances of four user-grade unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) is the main aim of this paper. This study investigates what is the more suitable UAS for specific applications considering the required scale factor, such as for architectural, environmental and restoration purposes. Some photogrammetric surveys were conducted in a 5 ha area using a Phantom 4 Adv, Mavic 2 Pro, Mavic Air 2 and Mavic Mini 2. These unmanned aircrafts are commercial systems used mainly by private professionals. Some photogrammetric reconstructions were carried out by varying flight altitude and camera settings of the 4 UAS. Structure-from-motion (SfM) algorithms were applied to the images taken from the UASs. The surveys' quality was analyzed by comparing the ground targets' coordinates measured on the field with indirect georeferencing through global navigation satellite system (GNSS). Fifty targets were installed and arranged following a kind of regular grid. For each photogrammetric flight, the boundary conditions were maintained the same, as well as the flight trajectories and the ground control point distribution. Altimetric and planimetric residuals were reported and compared for each photogrammetric survey. Using a regular grid of ground targets, the result obtained from Phantom 4 is one order of magnitude better than the ones obtained from the other UASs. Mavic Mini 2 leads to an error average of about 5 cm. Remembering that the Mavic Mini 2 is an ultralight drone (it does not require a pilot's license), it could significantly reduce costs compared to all the others.

Automated summary

The main aim of this study is to compare the photogrammetric performances of four user-grade unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) including Phantom 4 Adv, Mavic 2 Pro, Mavic Air 2, and Mavic Mini 2. The results show that Phantom 4 has the best performance, while Mavic Mini 2 has lower costs among ultralight drones.