4.7 Article

Ocean Front Detection with Glider and Satellite-Derived SST Data in the Southern California Current System

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 13, 期 24, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13245032

关键词

ocean fronts; SST; California current system; glider; MUR

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT), Mexico [CB-255602]
  2. [356866]
  3. [3180472]
  4. [FONDEQUIP EQM170214]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a method to detect ocean fronts using in situ temperature and density glider measurements, showing consistent results with previous studies in the California Current System. The comparison of glider and MUR datasets reveals temperature's significant contribution to front detection.
This study proposes a method to detect ocean fronts from in situ temperature and density glider measurements. This method is applied to data collected along the CalCOFI Line 90, south of the California Current System (CCS), over the 2006-2013 period. It is based on image-processing techniques commonly applied to sea surface temperature (SST) satellite data. Front detection results using glider data are consistent with those obtained in other studies carried out in the CCS. SST images of the Multi-scale Ultra-high Resolution (MUR) dataset were also used to compare the probability of occurrence or front frequency (FF) obtained with the two datasets. Glider and MUR temperatures are highly correlated. Along Line 90, frontal frequency exhibited the same maxima near the transition zone (~130 km offshore) as derived from MUR and glider datasets. However, marked differences were found in the bimonthly FF probability with high (low) front frequency in spring-summer for glider (MUR) data. Methodological differences explaining these contrasting results are investigated. Thermohaline-compensated fronts are more abundant towards the oceanic zone, although most fronts are detected using both temperature and density criteria, indicating a significant contribution of temperature to density in this region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据