4.7 Article

Chaos Based Frequency Modulation for Joint Monostatic and Bistatic Radar-Communication Systems

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 13, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13204113

关键词

chaos; frequency modulation; joint radar-communication; bistatic radar; high-resolution imaging; nonlinear detection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article proposes the use of chaos-based frequency modulated waveforms in radar-communication systems, utilizing chaotic oscillators to generate short-duration pulses for wideband radar imaging and embedding information via chaos shift keying. A self-synchronization technique decodes information at the receiver, while a nonlinear detection scheme optimizes target detection at the bistatic radar receiver. The CBFM waveforms closely follow the theoretical bit-error rate associated with BPSK and exhibit high-resolution imaging capability in the presence of noise and complex targets.
In this article, we propose the utilization of chaos-based frequency modulated (CBFM) waveforms for joint monostatic and bistatic radar-communication systems. Short-duration pulses generated via chaotic oscillators are used for wideband radar imaging, while information is embedded in the pulses using chaos shift keying (CSK). A self-synchronization technique for chaotic systems decodes the information at the communication receiver and reconstructs the transmitted waveform at the bistatic radar receiver. Using a nonlinear detection scheme, we show that the CBFM waveforms closely follow the theoretical bit-error rate (BER) associated with bipolar phase-shift keying (BPSK). We utilize the same nonlinear detection scheme to optimize the target detection at the bistatic radar receiver. The ambiguity function for both the monostatic and bistatic cases resembles a thumbtack ambiguity function with a pseudo-random sidelobe distribution. Furthermore, we characterize the high-resolution imaging capability of the CBFM waveforms in the presence of noise and considering a complex target.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据