4.7 Article

Rice Height Monitoring between Different Estimation Models Using UAV Photogrammetry and Multispectral Technology

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs14010078

关键词

flooded paddy field; photogrammetry; crop height; global navigation satellite system; multispectral; RGB

资金

  1. MEXT for Mathematics & Data Science Education program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, UAV photogrammetry was used to monitor crop height in a flooded paddy field. The results showed that UAV with higher accuracy GNSS receiver obtained more reliable estimations, while the UAV with moderate accuracy GNSS receiver also performed well. The performance of CHMs created by different methods was less affected by treatments, but more uniform distribution of vegetation over the water surface led to better performance.
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) photogrammetry was used to monitor crop height in a flooded paddy field. Three multi-rotor UAVs were utilized to conduct flight missions in order to capture RGB (RedGreenBlue) and multispectral images, and these images were analyzed using several different models to provide the best results. Two image sets taken by two UAVs, mounted with RGB cameras of the same resolution and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers of different accuracies, were applied to perform photogrammetry. Two methods were then proposed for creating crop height models (CHMs), one of which was denoted as the M1 method and was based on the Digital Surface Point Cloud (DSPC) and the Digital Terrain Point Cloud (DSPT). The other was denoted as the M2 method and was based on the DSPC and a bathymetric sensor. An image set taken by another UAV mounted with a multispectral camera was used for multispectral-based photogrammetry. A Normal Differential Vegetation Index (NDVI) and a Vegetation Fraction (VF) were then extracted. A new method based on multiple linear regression (MLR) combining the NDVI, the VF, and a Soil Plant Analysis Development (SPAD) value for estimating the measured height (MH) of rice was then proposed and denoted as the M3 method. The results show that the M1 method, the UAV with a GNSS receiver with a higher accuracy, obtained more reliable estimations, while the M2 method, the UAV with a GNSS receiver of moderate accuracy, was actually slightly better. The effect on the performance of CHMs created by the M1 and M2 methods is more negligible in different plots with different treatments; however, remarkably, the more uniform the distribution of vegetation over the water surface, the better the performance. The M3 method, which was created using only a SPAD value and a canopy NDVI value, showed the highest coefficient of determination (R2) for overall MH estimation, 0.838, compared with other combinations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据