4.7 Article

Early Detection of Wild Rocket Tracheofusariosis Using Hyperspectral Image-Based Machine Learning

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 14, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs14010084

关键词

machine learning; Diplotaxis tenuifolia; Fusarium oxysporum f; sp; raphani; precision agriculture; qPCR; pathogen quantification

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Agriculture, Food, and Forestry Policies (MiPAAF) [DM 36503.7305.2018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A machine learning model based on hyperspectral data was constructed to monitor the progression of wilting disease in wild rocket. The model was able to detect infected plants with an average accuracy of 0.8, even a few days after infection.
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. raphani is responsible for wilting wild rocket (Diplotaxis tenuifolia L. [D.C.]). A machine learning model based on hyperspectral data was constructed to monitor disease progression. Thus, pathogenesis after artificial inoculation was monitored over a 15-day period by symptom assessment, qPCR pathogen quantification, and hyperspectral imaging. The host colonization by a pathogen evolved accordingly with symptoms as confirmed by qPCR. Spectral data showed differences as early as 5-day post infection and 12 hypespectral vegetation indices were selected to follow disease development. The hyperspectral dataset was used to feed the XGBoost machine learning algorithm with the aim of developing a model that discriminates between healthy and infected plants during the time. The multiple cross-prediction strategy of the pixel-level models was able to detect hyperspectral disease profiles with an average accuracy of 0.8. For healthy pixel detection, the mean Precision value was 0.78, the Recall was 0.88, and the F1 Score was 0.82. For infected pixel detection, the average evaluation metrics were Precision: 0.73, Recall: 0.57, and F1 Score: 0.63. Machine learning paves the way for automatic early detection of infected plants, even a few days after infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据