4.7 Article

Flow Velocity Variations and Surface Change of the Destabilised Plator Rock Glacier (Central Italian Alps) from Aerial Surveys

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs14030635

关键词

Italian Alps; rock glacier; creep; permafrost; morphology; Bulk Creep Factor BCF

资金

  1. Italian MIUR project Dipartimenti di Eccellenza

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study measured the flow velocities of the Plator rock glacier in the Central Italian Alps using orthophotos acquired by drones from 2016 to 2020. The results showed different creep rates in different zones of the rock glacier, with higher rates near the front and lower rates in the rooting zone. The study also observed substantial advancement and destabilization processes in the Plator rock glacier between 1981 and 2020.
Flow velocities were measured on the Plator rock glacier in the Central Italian Alps using a correlation image analysis algorithm on orthophotos acquired by drones between the years 2016 and 2020. The spatial patterns of surface creep were then compared to the Bulk Creep Factor (BCF) spatial variability to interpret the rock glacier dynamics as a function of material properties and geometry. The rock glacier showed different creep rates in the rooting zone (0.40-0.90 m/y) and in the frontal zone (>4.0 m/y). Close to the rock glacier front, the BCF assumed the highest values, reaching values typical of rock glaciers experiencing destabilisation. Conversely, in the rooting zone the small rates corresponded to lowest BCFs, about five times smaller than in the frontal zone. The Plator rock glacier revealed a substantial advancement from 1981 to 2020 and distinct geomorphological features typical of rock glaciers exhibiting destabilising processes. Given the fast-moving phase, the advancement of both the front line and the front toe of the rock glacier, and the contrasting spatial distribution in the BCFs, the Plator could be considered a destabilised rock glacier.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据