4.7 Article

Mapping Urban Excavation Induced Deformation in 3D via Multiplatform InSAR Time-Series

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 13, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs13234748

关键词

InSAR; subsidence; tunneling; optimization; sequential excavation method

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) [69A3551747118]
  2. [EAR-1724794]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study used Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) time-series analysis to monitor and research surface deformations induced by the excavation of a subway station and rail crossover cavern in downtown Los Angeles, revealing previously unidentified deformations.
Excavation of a subway station and rail crossover cavern in downtown Los Angeles, California, USA, induced over 1.8 cm of surface settlement between June 2018 and February 2019 as measured by a ground-based monitoring system. Point measurements of surface deformation above the excavation were extracted by applying Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) time-series analyses to data from multiple sensors with different wavelengths. These sensors include C-band Sentinel-1, X-band COSMO-SkyMed, and L-band Uninhabited Aerial Vehicle SAR (UAVSAR). The InSAR time-series point measurements were interpolated to continuous distribution surfaces, weighted by distance, and entered into the Minimum-Acceleration (MinA) algorithm to calculate 3D displacement values. This dataset, composed of satellite and airborne SAR data from X, C, and L band sensors, revealed previously unidentified deformation surrounding the 2nd Street and Broadway Subway Station and the adjacent rail crossover cavern, with maximum vertical and horizontal deformations reaching 2.5 cm and 1.7 cm, respectively. In addition, the analysis shows that airborne SAR data with alternative viewing geometries to traditional polar-orbiting SAR satellites can be used to constrain horizontal displacements in the North-South direction while maintaining agreement with ground-based data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据