4.7 Article

Spectral Comparison of UAV-Based Hyper and Multispectral Cameras for Precision Viticulture

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs14030449

关键词

vegetation indices; precision agriculture; remote sensing; spectral signature; imaging sensor; radiometric calibration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Analysis of the spectral response of vegetation using optical sensors is crucial for non-destructive remote monitoring of crops. This study compares the performance of two commercial UAV-based products, DJI P4M and SENOP HSC-2, for acquiring multispectral and hyperspectral images in vineyards. The results show the importance of radiometric calibration using reference panels for multispectral images, and the higher accuracy of the hyperspectral camera. The use of segmentation techniques can resolve performance issues caused by mixed targets.
Analysis of the spectral response of vegetation using optical sensors for non-destructive remote monitoring represents a key element for crop monitoring. Considering the wide presence on the market of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAVs) based commercial solutions, the need emerges for clear information on the performance of these products to guide the end-user in their choice and utilization for precision agriculture applications. This work aims to compare two UAV based commercial products, represented by DJI P4M and SENOP HSC-2 for the acquisition of multispectral and hyperspectral images, respectively, in vineyards. The accuracy of both cameras was evaluated on 6 different targets commonly found in vineyards, represented by bare soil, bare-stony soil, stony soil, soil with dry grass, partially grass covered soil and canopy. Given the importance of the radiometric calibration, four methods for multispectral images correction were evaluated, taking in account the irradiance sensor equipped on the camera (M1-M2) and the use of an empirical line model (ELM) based on reference reflectance panels (M3-M4). In addition, different DJI P4M exposure setups were evaluated. The performance of the cameras was evaluated by means of the calculation of three widely used vegetation indices (VIs), as percentage error (PE) with respect to ground truth spectroradiometer measurements. The results highlighted the importance of reference panels for the radiometric calibration of multispectral images (M1-M2 average PE = 21.8-100.0%; M3-M4 average PE = 11.9-29.5%). Generally, the hyperspectral camera provided the best accuracy with a PE ranging between 1.0% and 13.6%. Both cameras showed higher performance on the pure canopy pixel target, compared to mixed targets. However, this issue can be easily solved by applying widespread segmentation techniques for the row extraction. This work provides insights to assist end-users in the UAV spectral monitoring to obtain reliable information for the analysis of spatio-temporal variability within vineyards.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据