4.7 Article

Analysis of Ionic-Exchange of Selected Elements between Novel Nano-Hydroxyapatite-Silica Added Glass Ionomer Cement and Natural Teeth

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 13, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13203504

关键词

ion-exchange; nano-hydroxyapatite; nano-silica; bonding; ionic-bonding; nano-HA-Si; SEM-EDX

资金

  1. Universiti Sains Malaysia, Research University Individual (RUI) Grant Scheme [1001/PPSG/8012355, UO1937, 2020/0205]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to investigate the transfer of specific elements between nano-HA-SiO2-GIC and human enamel and dentine, suggesting potential increased remineralization with nano-HA-SiO2-GIC compared to conventional GIC (Fuji IX).
One of the foremost missions in restorative dentistry is to discover a suitable material that can substitute lost and damaged tooth structure. To this date, most of the restorative materials utilized in dentistry are bio-inert. It is predicted that the addition of nano-HA-SiO2 to GIC matrix could produce a material with better ion-exchange between the restorative material and natural teeth. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to synthesize and investigate the transfer of specific elements (calcium, phosphorus, fluoride, silica, strontium, and alumina) between nano-hydroxyapatite-silica added GIC (nano-HA-SiO2-GIC) and human enamel and dentine. The novel nano-hydroxyapatite-silica (nano-HA-SiO2) was synthesized using one-pot sol-gel method and added to cGIC. Semi-quantitative energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis was carried out to determine the elemental distribution of fluorine, silicon, phosphorus, calcium, strontium, and aluminum. Semi-quantitative energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis was performed by collecting line-scans and dot-scans. The results of the current study seem to confirm the ionic exchange between nano-HA-SiO2-GIC and natural teeth, leading to the conclusion that increased remineralization may be possible with nano-HA-SiO2-GIC as compared to cGIC (Fuji IX).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据