4.7 Article

3D Printing of Customized Aspheric Lenses for Imaging

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 13, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13203477

关键词

3D printing; aspheric lenses; stereolithography; meniscus equilibrium method

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62175221]
  2. Consolidation Program for Fundamental Research [2019JCJQZDXX00]
  3. Outstanding Youth Talents Project [2017-JCJQ-ZQ-024]
  4. Foundation for Youth Talents of LFRC, CAEP [LFRC-PD012]
  5. Foundation for Scientific and Technological Innovations of CAEP [CX2019025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A simple and efficient process for fabricating customized aspheric lenses using a stereolithographic 3D printer and a meniscus equilibrium post-curing technique is reported. The experiments showed that lenses printed with DentaClear resin had better surface quality and optical properties compared to those printed with HEMA resin.
A simple and efficient process for fabricating customized aspheric lenses is reported, in which a stereolithographic 3D printer combined with the meniscus equilibrium post-curing technique is employed. Two kinds of UV-curable resins, DentaClear and HEMA, were used for printing aspheric lenses in our experiments. The printed DentaClear lens featured low surface profile deviation of ~74 mu m and showed satisfactory optical imaging resolution of 50.80 lp/mm, i.e., 4.92 mu m. The surface roughness of the printed lens with DentaClear was measured to be around 2 nm with AFM. The surface roughness was improved as a result of post-curing, which reduced the ripples on printed lens surfaces. In contrast, the printed HEMA lens exhibited a significant stair-stepping effect with a large surface profile deviation of ~150 mu m. The ripples were somewhat apparent even if the printed HEMA lens surface was smoothed by means of post-curing. No sharp image can be obtained with the HEMA lens in the resolution testing. The composition of HEMA resin may be the reason for the relatively poor surface quality and optical properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据