4.7 Article

Significantly Enhanced Crystallization of Poly(ethylene succinate-co-1,2-propylene succinate) by Cellulose Nanocrystals as an Efficient Nucleating Agent

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym14020224

关键词

poly(ethylene succinate-co-1; 2-propylene succinate); cellulose nanocrystals; crystallization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation, China [51573016, 51521062, 52173019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research investigated the effect of cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) on the crystallization behavior, crystalline morphology, and crystal structure of Poly(ethylene succinate-co-1,2-propylene succinate) (PEPS). The results showed that CNC enhanced the crystallization rate of PEPS and acted as a heterogeneous nucleating agent. The induction of CNC played an important role in the nucleation mechanism of PEPS.
Poly(ethylene succinate-co-1,2-propylene succinate) (PEPS) is a novel aliphatic biodegradable polyester with good mechanical properties. Due to the presence of methyl as a side group, the crystallization rate of PEPS is remarkably slower than that of the poly(ethylene succinate) homopolymer. To promote the potential application of PEPS, the effect of cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) on the crystallization behavior, crystalline morphology, and crystal structure of PEPS was investigated in this research with the aim of increasing the crystallization rate. CNC enhanced both the melt crystallization behavior of PEPS during the cooling process and the overall crystallization rate during the isothermal crystallization process. The crystallization rate of PEPS became faster with an increase in CNC content. The crystalline morphology study directly confirmed the heterogeneous nucleating agent role of CNC. The crystal structure of PEPS remained unchanged in the composites. On the basis of the interfacial energy, the nucleation mechanism of PEPS in the composites was further discussed by taking into consideration the induction of CNC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据