4.7 Article

Modeling and Experiment for the Diffusion Coefficient of Subcritical Carbon Dioxide in Poly(methyl methacrylate) to Predict Gas Sorption and Desorption

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 14, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym14030596

关键词

poly(methyl methacrylate); diffusion coefficient; gas sorption; solubility; solid-state batch foaming; gas desorption; curve fitting

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [NFR-2018R1D1A1B07049405]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the diffusion coefficient of PMMA in polymer-gas mixtures and proposes a diffusion coefficient model based on experimental data and Fick's law. The model is validated by comparing with existing literature, showing consistent results.
Several researchers have investigated the phenomenon of polymer-gas mixtures, and a few have proposed diffusion coefficient values instead of a diffusion coefficient model. There is a paucity of studies focused on the continuous change in the diffusion coefficient corresponding to the overall pressure and temperature range of the mixture. In this study, the gas sorption and desorption experiments of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) were conducted via solid-state batch foaming, and the weight change was measured using the gravimetric method with a magnetic balance. The control parameters were temperature, which ranged from 290 to 370 K, and pressure, which ranged from 2 to 5 MPa in the subcritical regime. Based on the experimental data, the diffusion coefficient of the PMMA was calculated using Fick's law. After calculating the diffusion coefficient in the range of the experiment, the diffusion coefficient model was employed using the least-squares method. Subsequently, the model was validated by comparing the obtained results with those in the literature, and the overall trend was found to be consistent. Therefore, it was confirmed that there were slight differences between the diffusion coefficient obtained using only Fick's equation and the value using by a different method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据