4.7 Article

Antibacterial and Antifungal Properties of Electrospun Recycled PET Polymeric Fibers Functionalized with Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 13, 期 21, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13213763

关键词

recycled poly (ethylene terephthalate); electrospinning; zinc oxide nanoparticles; antibacterial activity; antifungal activity

资金

  1. Flemish Interuniversity Council (VLIR)
  2. Research Direction of the University of Cuenca (DIUC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, polymeric fibers made from recycled PET were functionalized with different percentages of ZnO nanoparticles to evaluate their antibacterial and antifungal properties. The results showed promising antimicrobial effects, especially at higher concentrations of ZnO nanoparticles.
Currently, to reduce the environmental problems associated with plastic waste, methods are being sought to use this waste as raw materials in different applications, such as fibers. In addition, to improve these materials and provide different properties, nanoparticles (NPs) are incorporated. In the present work, polymeric fibers made of recycled polyethylene terephthalate (r-PET) from post-consumer water bottles, functionalized with 0%, 1.5%, 3% and 6% zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO-NPs) in function of r-PET weight, were elaborated to evaluate their antibacterial and antifungal characteristics. The ZnO-NPs were synthesized by the solvothermal method, obtaining particles with a mean diameter of 38.15 nm, while the fibers were obtained by electrospinning with a diameter range between 200-5000 nm. The functionalized fibers were carried out against Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis through the agar diffusion method, obtaining the highest inhibition halo at 6% w/w ZnO-NPs, being 26.5 mm and 34.25 mm, respectively. In addition, the same method was used to evaluate the antifungal activity of Penicillium s.p. and Fusarium graminearum, observing antifungal properties due to the presence of nanoparticles in the fibers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据