4.7 Article

Structure-Elastic Properties Relationships in Gelling Carrageenans

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 13, 期 23, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13234120

关键词

carrageenan; hydrogel; nonlinear elasticity

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT), through the E2B2-PHACAR project [E2B2-PHACAR]
  2. FCT [UID/CTM/50025/2020]
  3. [PTDC/BII-BIO/5626/2020]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/BII-BIO/5626/2020] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reviews the relationship between carrageenan gel structure and elastic properties, and discusses the comparison of linear and nonlinear elastic models with structural and rheological data, focusing on the concentration scaling of strain hardening exhibited by different types of carrageenan gels.
Gelling carrageenans are polysaccharides extracted from the Gigartinales order of red algae. These are additives used essentially in the food industry for texturizing, stabilizing or gelling various formulations. Although a consensual gel mechanism has been reached which encompasses a coil-to-helix transition followed by the self-assembling of helices in a network, the structure-elastic relationships in the network are still to be clearly established. This paper reviews the reports in which carrageenan gel structures have been systematically compared with gel elastic properties. The focus is on the sizes documented for structural units, such as strands, aggregates, voids or network meshes, as well as on the reported linear and nonlinear elastic characteristics. The insufficient rationalization of carrageenan gel elasticity by models which take on board mechanically relevant structural features is underlined. After introducing selected linear and nonlinear elastic models, preliminary results comparing such models to structural and rheological data are presented. In particular, the concentration scaling of the strain hardening exhibited by two types of carrageenan gels is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据