4.7 Article

Selectively Etched Halloysite Nanotubes as Performance Booster of Epoxidized Natural Rubber Composites

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 13, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13203536

关键词

epoxidized natural rubber; halloysite nanotubes; acid treatment; tensile properties; wide-angle X-ray scattering

资金

  1. Faculty of Science and Technology, Prince of Songkla University, Pattani Campus, through a SAT-ASEAN research grant [SAT590594S]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focused on modifying natural rubber into Epoxidized Natural Rubber (ENR) to improve compatibility with Halloysite Nanotubes (HNT). Acid-treated HNT filler showed enhanced performance in the composites, including improved modulus, tensile strength, and tear strength.
Halloysite Nanotubes (HNT) are chemically similar to clay, which makes them incompatible with non-polar rubbers such as natural rubber (NR). Modification of NR into a polar rubber is of interest. In this work, Epoxidized Natural Rubber (ENR) was prepared in order to obtain a composite that could assure filler-matrix compatibility. However, the performance of this composite was still not satisfactory, so an alternative to the basic HNT filler was pursued. The surface area of HNT was further increased by etching with acid; the specific surface increased with treatment time. The FTIR spectra confirmed selective etching on the Al-OH surface of HNT with reduction in peak intensity in the regions 3750-3600 cm(-1) and 825-725 cm(-1), indicating decrease in Al-OH structures. The use of acid-treated HNT improved modulus, tensile strength, and tear strength of the filled composites. This was attributed to the filler-matrix interactions of acid-treated HNT with ENR. Further evidence was found from the Payne effect being reduced to 44.2% through acid treatment of the filler. As for the strain-induced crystallization (SIC) in the composites, the stress-strain curves correlated well with the degree of crystallinity observed from synchrotron wide-angle X-ray scattering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据