4.7 Review

Effect of the Elongational Flow on the Morphology and Properties of Polymer Systems: A Brief Review

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 13, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym13203529

关键词

elongational flow; elongational viscosity; film blowing; fiber spinning; strain hardening; morphology evolution; multiphase polymer systems

资金

  1. INSTM [INDPA 004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals the significance of polymer-processing operations with dominating elongational flow in various industrial applications, emphasizing the importance of evaluating rheological properties to understand material-processing behavior. It also discusses the morphological evolution of polymer systems under elongational flow influence.
Polymer-processing operations with dominating elongational flow have a great relevance, especially in several relevant industrial applications. Film blowing, fiber spinning and foaming are some examples in which the polymer melt is subjected to elongational flow during processing. To gain a thorough knowledge of the material-processing behavior, the evaluation of the rheological properties of the polymers experiencing this kind of flow is fundamental. This paper reviews the main achievements regarding the processing-structure-properties relationships of polymer-based materials processed through different operations with dominating elongational flow. In particular, after a brief discussion on the theoretical features associated with the elongational flow and the differences with other flow regimes, the attention is focused on the rheological properties in elongation of the most industrially relevant polymers. Finally, the evolution of the morphology of homogeneous polymers, as well as of multiphase polymer-based systems, such as blends and micro- and nano-composites, subjected to the elongational flow is discussed, highlighting the potential and the unique characteristics of the processing operations based on elongation flow, as compared to their shear-dominated counterparts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据