4.6 Article

Grhl3 promotes retention of epidermal cells under endocytic stress to maintain epidermal architecture in zebrafish

期刊

PLOS GENETICS
卷 17, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009823

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome trust-DBT India Alliance [500129Z-09-Z]
  2. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (SPM fellowship)
  3. TIFR-DAE [RTI4003, 12P-121]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research demonstrates that in zebrafish embryos, epidermal cells that round up due to membrane homeostasis defects can be reintegrated into the epithelium to maintain tissue homeostasis. The transcription factor Grhl3 induces the retention of rounded cells by regulating E-cadherin levels, facilitating cell adhesion, retention, and epidermal architecture in embryos deficient in specific functions. This mechanism of retention of rounded cells is crucial for epithelial homeostasis.
Epithelia such as epidermis cover large surfaces and are crucial for survival. Maintenance of tissue homeostasis by balancing cell proliferation, cell size, and cell extrusion ensures epidermal integrity. Although the mechanisms of cell extrusion are better understood, how epithelial cells that round up under developmental or perturbed genetic conditions are reintegrated in the epithelium to maintain homeostasis remains unclear. Here, we performed live imaging in zebrafish embryos to show that epidermal cells that round up due to membrane homeostasis defects in the absence of goosepimples/myosinVb (myoVb) function, are reintegrated into the epithelium. Transcriptome analysis and genetic interaction studies suggest that the transcription factor Grainyhead-like 3 (Grhl3) induces the retention of rounded cells by regulating E-cadherin levels. Moreover, Grhl3 facilitates the survival of MyoVb deficient embryos by regulating cell adhesion, cell retention, and epidermal architecture. Our analyses have unraveled a mechanism of retention of rounded cells and its importance in epithelial homeostasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据