4.6 Article

Combination and competition between path integration and landmark navigation in the estimation of heading direction

期刊

PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
卷 18, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009222

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF Division of Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences [BCS-1630296]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Successful navigation requires computing one's location and heading from multisensory information. This study investigated how body-based idiothetic and visual allothetic cues are integrated in heading computation using virtual reality. The results show that participants combine the cues when the mismatch between them is small, but compete when the mismatch is large, suggesting a hybrid strategy of cue integration and competition.
Successful navigation requires the ability to compute one's location and heading from incoming multisensory information. Previous work has shown that this multisensory input comes in two forms: body based idiothetic cues, from one's own rotations and translations, and visual allothetic cues, from the environment (usually visual landmarks). However, exactly how these two streams of information are integrated is unclear, with some models suggesting the body based idiothetic and visual allothetic cues are combined, while others suggest they compete. In this paper we investigated the integration of body-based idiothetic and visual allothetic cues in the computation of heading using virtual reality. In our experiment, participants performed a series of body turns of up to 360 degrees in the dark with only a brief flash (300ms) of visual feedback en route. Because the environment was virtual, we had full control over the visual feedback and were able to vary the offset between this feedback and the true heading angle. By measuring the effect of the feedback offset on the angle participants turned, we were able to determine the extent to which they incorporated visual feedback as a function of the offset error. By further modeling this behavior we were able to quantify the computations people used. While there were considerable individual differences in performance on our task, with some participants mostly ignoring the visual feedback and others relying on it almost entirely, our modeling results suggest that almost all participants used the same strategy in which idiothetic and allothetic cues are combined when the mismatch between them is small, but compete when the mismatch is large. These findings suggest that participants update their estimate of heading using a hybrid strategy that mixes the combination and competition of cues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据