4.7 Article

Carrier Injection and Manipulation of Charge-Density Wave in Kagome Superconductor CsV3Sb5

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW X
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevX.12.011001

关键词

-

资金

  1. JST-CREST [JPMJCR18T1]
  2. JST-PRESTO [JPMJPR18L7]
  3. JSPS KAKENHI [JP17H01139, JP18H01160]
  4. National Key R&D Program of China [2020YFA0308800]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of China [92065109, 11734003, 12061131002]
  6. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [Z190006]
  7. Beijing Institute of Technology (BIT) Research Fund Program for Young Scholars [3180012222011]
  8. GP-Spin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Successful electron doping to CsV3Sb5 by Cs dosing has been achieved, and the electron filling of the Sb 5p(z) and V 3d(xz/yz) bands can be selectively increased while suppressing the CDW. This result reveals the crucial role of multiorbital effect in CDW and superconductivity.
Kagome metals AV(3)Sb(5) (A = K, Rb, and Cs) exhibit a unique superconducting ground state coexisting with charge-density wave (CDW), whereas how these characteristics are affected by carrier doping remains unexplored because of the lack of an efficient carrier-doping method. Here we report successful electron doping to CsV3Sb5 by Cs dosing, as visualized by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy. We found that the electron doping with Cs dosing proceeds in an orbital-selective way, as characterized by a marked increase in electron filling of the Sb 5p(z) and V 3d(xz/yz) bands as opposed to the relatively insensitive nature of the V 3d(xy)/x(2)-y(2) bands. By monitoring the temperature evolution of the CDW gap around the (M) over bar point, we found that the CDW can be completely killed by Cs dosing while keeping the saddle point with the V 3d(xy)/x(2)-y(2) character almost pinned at the Fermi level. The present result suggests a crucial role of multiorbital effect to the occurrence of CDW and provides an important step toward manipulating the CDW and superconductivity in AV(3)Sb(5).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据