4.2 Article

Friction stir welding of nano/ultrafine-grained AA2024 alloy produced through an accumulative roll bonding process

期刊

MRS COMMUNICATIONS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 51-57

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1557/s43579-021-00139-4

关键词

Nano; ultrafine-grained materials; AA2024 alloy; Accumulative roll bonding; Friction stir welding; Electron backscatter diffraction; Microhardness

资金

  1. Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea through the Postdoctoral Fellowship in Brain Korea 21 Program
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT [2020M2D8A206983011]
  3. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of South Korea [2017R1A2B3009135]
  4. Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) [97007958]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nano/ultrafine-grained structures were produced in AA2024 alloy sheets using accumulative roll bonding (ARB) followed by friction stir welding (FSW). The FSW process caused localized heat generation and resulted in divergent grain structures in different regions of the weld nugget. The texture components in the stir zone were Cube {001}<100>, S {123}<634>, B {112}<110>, C {001}<110>, and copper {112}<111>. Grain growth phenomena, softening, and microhardness reduction were also observed.
Nano/ultrafine-grained (NG/UFG) structure was produced in AA2024 alloy sheets by an accumulative roll bonding ( ARB) and was subsequently joined by friction stir welding (FSW). Having evaluated the welded zone microstructurally and mechanically, this study's characterization confirmed the efficient and successful binding of these sheets through applying FSW. Localized Heat generation as a consequence of the FSW process caused the different regions of the weld nugget to have divergent grain structures. The texture components in the stir zone were Cube {001}<100>, S {123}<634>, B {112}< 110 >, C {001}< 110 >, and copper {112}< 111 >. Also, the grain growth phenomena, softening, and microhardness reduction were observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据