4.5 Article

Autonomous Motivation and Information Security Policy Compliance: Role of Job Satisfaction, Responsibility, and Deterrence

出版社

IGI GLOBAL
DOI: 10.4018/JOEUC.20211101.oa9

关键词

Social exchange theory; Self-determination theory; Intrinsic motivation; Extrinsic motivation; Internalization; Positive psychology; Organizational behavior; Empower; Persistent

资金

  1. National Social Science Foundation of China [CIA200273]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that job satisfaction and personal responsibility positively influence employees' information security policy compliance, and that self-determination helps regulate the relationship between job satisfaction and personal responsibility. The research suggests that organizations should promote employees' perceived self-determination and maintain deterrence at a moderate level to adapt to the security strategy and information security environment of the organization.
Many existing studies focus on the effect of external influence mechanisms (e.g., deterrence) impacting information security policy compliance (ISPC). This study explores the formation of ISPC from an autonomous motivation perspective, based on social exchange theory and self-determination theory. Data were gathered by conducting a survey of 261 employees, with hierarchical regression analysis being used to test the hypotheses. The results indicated the following: First, job satisfaction and personal responsibility positively impact ISPC. Second, job satisfaction perceived by employees is positively linked to personal responsibility, where deterrence severity has a negative moderating effect on this relationship. Finally, personal responsibility mediates the relationship between job satisfaction and ISPC. This study suggests that organizational support should focus on promoting perceived self-determination of employees and that deterrence should be maintained at a moderate level to adapt to the organization's security strategy and information security environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据