4.3 Article

Corneal Cross-Linking as Treatment in Pediatric Keratoconus: Comparison of Two Protocols

期刊

JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 2021, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2021/2659828

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the outcomes of standard and accelerated CXL in pediatric population with keratoconus, finding no significant differences in visual acuity, keratometry, and tomographic parameters between the two protocols. The results suggest that accelerated CXL is as safe and effective as standard CXL for stabilizing progressive keratoconus in children.
Introduction. Keratoconus is a progressive corneal disease commonly treated by collagen cross-linking (CXL). Accelerated protocols have recently become common. This study sought to compare the outcomes of accelerated and standard CXL in terms of visual acuity, keratometry, and tomographic parameters in pediatric population. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the files of pediatric patients who underwent standard and accelerated CXL for keratoconus in our hospital, between October 2014 and March 2018. Changes in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), tomographic keratometry parameters (K-max, K-steep, K-flat, K-mean), and endothelial density count (EDC) were assessed before and at 6 and 12 months following treatment. The analysis included intergroup and intragroup comparisons. Results. This study included 53 eyes (44 patients). Fourteen eyes were treated with standard CXL (S-CXL, 3 mW/cm(2), 30 min), while 39 underwent accelerated CXL (A-CXL, 9 mW/cm(2), 10 min). Intergroup comparison found insignificant differences between groups, with the exception of better results for UCDVA in the S-CXL group after 12 months (P = 0.03). In this study, there was no significant difference between the two protocols postoperatively in BCDVA, K-max, K-mean, pachymetry, or corneal astigmatism. Conclusion. A-CXL is as safe and effective as S-CXL for stabilizing progressive keratoconus in pediatric population. Larger-sample-size studies with a longer follow-up time are required. Considering the long-term results of 9 mW A-CXL and its safety and efficacy profile, it should be preferred to S-CXL for reducing treatment time and improving patients' comfort.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据