4.3 Article

Clinical Outcomes of Accelerated Corneal Cross-Linking for Pediatric Keratoconus

期刊

JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 2021, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2021/1851883

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accelerated corneal cross-linking is effective and safe in halting the progression of pediatric keratoconus, with improved visual acuities.
Aim. To assess the efficacy and safety of accelerated corneal cross-linking in the treatment of pediatric keratoconus. Method. In this retrospective case series, 29 eyes of 20 pediatric patients with keratoconus underwent accelerated corneal cross-linking. Treatment was delivered at 10 mW/cm(2) for 9 minutes with a total dose of 5.4 J/cm(2). Clinical evaluation included visual acuities and refractive and Scheimpflug corneal tomography assessments. All patients with a minimum follow-up duration of 24 months were included in the study. Results. Mean +/- standard deviation age was 15.41 +/- 2.13 years (range: 8 to 18 years). Uncorrected distance visual acuity improved significantly from 0.56 +/- 0.28 to 0.42 +/- 0.29 logMAR (P = 0.0003), and corrected distance visual acuity improved significantly from 0.34 +/- 0.23 to 0.28 +/- 0.22 logMAR (P = 0.014). (e mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent value was significantly reduced (-0.59 +/- 0.95 D, P = 0.0024). While mean flat keratometry and steep keratometry values were not significantly altered (P > 0.05 for both), the mean maximum keratometry value was significantly decreased from 56.97 +/- 5.24D preoperatively to 55.84 +/- 5.37D at 24 months postoperatively (P = 0.003). Maximum keratometry had progressed by >1D in two eyes (6.89%). Permanent corneal haze was reported in one case (3.44%). Conclusion. Our 24-month follow-up demonstrated that accelerated corneal cross-linking appears to halt the progression of keratoconus in pediatric patients without apparent complications. Uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities were also improved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据