4.6 Article

Effect of equalising ignition delay on combustion and soot emission characteristics of model fuel blends

期刊

JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 89-101

出版社

JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIV
DOI: 10.1007/s11771-022-4930-z

关键词

combustion characteristics; soot emission; compression ignition engine; ignition improver; premixed phase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigated the effect of equalizing ignition delay in a compression ignition engine, finding that adding an ignition improver reduced soot generation. Different fuel mixtures did not significantly affect ignition delay and fuel air premixing rate.
This paper examines the effect of equalizing ignition delay in a compression ignition engine. Two sets of tests were conducted, i.e. a set of constant injection timing tests with start of fuel injection at 10 degrees crank angle degree (CAD) before top dead center (BTDC) and a set of constant ignition timing tests while also keeping the 10 degrees CAD BTDC injection and adding ignition improver (2-ethylhexylnitrate-, 2-EHN) to the fuel mixtures. Soot particles were characterized using DMS-500 instrument in terms of mass, size, and number. The experimental results showed that adding 2-EHN to the model fuel blends reduced the soot surface area, soot mass concentration and soot mean size. Replacing 20 vol% of a C-7-heptane with 20 vol% methyl-decanoate (an oxygenated C-11 molecule) did not affect the ignition delay or rate of fuel air premixing, the peak in-cylinder pressure or heat release rates. Toluene addition (0-22.5 vol%) to heptane increased the mean size of the soot particles generated by only 3% while also resulted in a slight increase in the peak cylinder pressure and peak heat release rates. Blending toluene and methyl-decanoate into heptane without adding 2-EHN increased the premix phase fraction by at least 13%. However, by adding 2-EHN (4x10(-4)-1.5x10(-3)), the premixed phase fraction decreased by at least 11%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据