4.4 Article

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Inflammatory Back Pain: Known or Suspected Axial Spondyloarthritis: 2021 Update

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY
卷 18, 期 11S, 页码 5340-5360

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.003

关键词

Appropriateness Criteria; Appropriate Use Criteria; AUC; Ankylosing spondylitis; Arthritis; Axial spondyloarthritis; Inflammatory back pain; Sacroiliac joints; Spine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inflammatory back pain is a key feature of axial spondyloarthritis, and imaging plays a crucial role in diagnosis and treatment. This document provides evidence-based recommendations on imaging studies for patients with suspected or known axial spondyloarthritis, following the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria guidelines.
Inflammatory back pain is a hallmark feature of axial spondyloarthritis, a heterogeneous group of inflammatory disorders which affects the sacroiliac joints and spine. Imaging plays a key role in diagnosis of this disease and in facilitating appropriate treatment. This document provides evidence-based recommendations on the appropriate use of imaging studies during multiple stages of the clinical evaluation of patients with suspected or known axial spondyloarthritis. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据