4.6 Review

The role of the wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in formation and maintenance of bone and teeth

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2016.05.015

关键词

beta-catenin; Wnts; Bone; Osteocytes; Teeth; Mechanosensation

资金

  1. NIH NIA [PO1AG039355]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Wnt signaling pathway is known as one of the important molecular cascades that regulate cell fate throughout lifespan. The Wnt signaling pathway is further separated into the canonical signaling pathway that depends on the function of beta-catenin (Wnt/beta-catenin pathway) and the noncanonical pathways that operate independently of beta-catenin (planar cell polarity pathway and Wnt/Ca2+ pathway). The Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway is complex and consists of numerous receptors, inhibitors, activators, modulators, phosphatases, kinases and other components. However, there is one central, critical molecule to this pathway, beta-catenin. While there are at least 3 receptors, LRP 4, 5 and 6, and over twenty activators known as the wnts, and several inhibitors such as sclerostin, dickkopf and secreted frizzled-related protein, these all target beta-catenin. These regulators/modulators function to target beta-catenin either to the proteasome for degradation or to the nucleus to regulate gene expression. Therefore, the interaction of beta-catenin with different factors and Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway will be the subject of this review with a focus on how this pathway relates to and functions in the formation and maintenance of bone and teeth based on mainly basic and pre-clinical research. Also in this review, the role of this pathway in osteocytes, bone cells embedded in the mineralized matrix, is covered in depth. This pathway is not only important in mineralized tissue growth and development, but for modulation of the skeleton in response to loading and unloading and the viability and health of the adult and aging skeleton. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据