4.3 Review

Nurses' Experience of Nursing Workload-Related Issues during Caring Patients with Dementia: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph181910448

关键词

dementia; Alzheimer's disease; nurses; workloads; work-related stress; qualitative research

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [2021R1A2C2006359]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2021R1A2C2006359] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study identified that nurses caring for dementia patients face significant workloads and mental stress, in addition to difficulties in playing a mediator role and lack of systematic support. To reduce the burden on nurses, supportive measures tailored to their occupational characteristics should be developed based on workload estimates that consider the unique attributes of dementia patients.
The behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), which appear in all dementia patients, demand sizable commitments of time and effort from nurses. This study aims to identify issues related to the workloads of nurses who provide care for dementia patients via qualitative meta-synthesis. Eleven articles were selected using a systematic review flowchart, which were then evaluated for their quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program checklist. Collected data were analyzed using a line-of-argument method. Theme clusters were increased workload due to characteristics of dementia, increased mental stress, difficulty associated with playing a mediator role in addition to nursing duties, and lacking systematic support for dementia patient care. To reduce the workload and mental stress of nurses in dementia care, supportive measures appropriate for their occupational characteristics should be developed, based on workload estimates that account for the attributes of dementia patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据