4.3 Article

Use of E-Health in Dutch General Practice during the COVID-19 Pandemic

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182312479

关键词

general practice; e-health; COVID-19

资金

  1. Dutch Healthcare Authority (NZa)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the impact of COVID-19 on the use of e-health in general practices in the Netherlands, revealing an increased uptake of e-health applications during the pandemic. However, only a minority of practices intend to maintain this increased use, indicating a temporary uptake of digital healthcare delivery rather than accelerated implementation of digital processes. Additionally, small differences in the use of e-health between different practice types were found.
The COVID-19 pandemic has forced general practices to search for possibilities to provide healthcare remotely (e.g., e-health). In this study, the impact of the pandemic on the use of e-health in general practices in the Netherlands was investigated. In addition, the intention of practices to continue using e-health more intensively and differences in the use of e-health between practice types were investigated. For this purpose, web surveys were sent to general practices in April and July 2020. Descriptive data analysis was performed and differences in the use of e-health between practice types were tested using one-way ANOVA. Response rates were 34% (n = 1433) in April and 17% (n = 719) in July. The pandemic invoked an increased use of several (new) e-health applications. A minority of practices indicated the intention to maintain this increased use. In addition, small differences in the use of e-health between the different practice types were found. This study showed that although there was an increased uptake of e-health in Dutch general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic, only a minority of practices intends to maintain this increased use in the future. This may point towards a temporary uptake of digital healthcare delivery rather than accelerated implementation of digital processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据