4.5 Article

Attitude for vaccination prophylaxis among pregnant women: a cross-sectional study

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2031698

关键词

Influenza vaccine; dTaP vaccine; MMR vaccine; rubella; torch complex; pregnancy; prevention

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pregnant women and new mothers have low awareness and compliance with recommended vaccinations for vaccine-preventable diseases. Efforts should be made to raise awareness and improve vaccination rates in this population.
Pregnant women and newborns are considered a subgroup of population at increased risk for several infectious diseases, some of which are vaccine-preventable. Anti-diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine (dTpa) and influenza vaccine are recommended for pregnant women. We carried out a study to evaluate the knowledge of new mothers toward the main vaccine-preventable diseases and to assess their compliance with recommended vaccinations. Using the Hospital Discharge Forms (SDO), the list of women who gave birth in 2018 was generated. Women were interviewed by a questionnaire administered by telephone. The study sample consisted of 145 subjects, with an average age of 35.0 +/- 5.9 years (range = 18.0-47.0). 5/145 (3.4%; 95% CI = 1.1-7.9%) subjects were advised during pregnancy to have the flu shot; only 1/145 (0.7%; 95% CI = 0.5-71.6%) reported the flu vaccine during the last pregnancy. 94/145 (64.8%; 95% CI = 57.2-73.2%) respondents declared that they had carried out the TORCH panel exams before pregnancy; of these 18/94 (19.2%; 95% C = 11.8-28.6%) were susceptible for rubella. Of these subjects, for 7/18 (38.9%; 95% CI = 17.3-64.3%) rubella vaccination was offered and 5/7 (71.4%; 95% CI = 29.0-96.3%) decided to carry out the vaccination. Only 1/145 (0.7%; 95% CI = 0.0-3.8%) of the interviewed woman underwent anti-dTap vaccination. Greater efforts must be made by public health institutions to raise awareness and improve vaccination compliance in this population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据