4.5 Article

Retrieval of Svalbard ice flow velocities using Sentinel 1A/1B three-pass Differential SAR Interferometry

期刊

GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL
卷 37, 期 25, 页码 10130-10151

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2022.2032391

关键词

Glacier movement; Differential SAR Interferometry; 2-pass and 3-pass interferometry; DEM; coherence and interferogram

资金

  1. BRICS Science, Technology and Innovation Framework Programme (BRICS STI FP) from the Department of Science and Technology, India [DST/IMRCD/BRICS/PilotCall1/Col-GaSS/2017 (G)]
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research, Russia [17-55-80107]
  3. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development, Brazil [441810/2016-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glacier velocity is a crucial parameter for glacier dynamics, and the 3-pass DInSAR technique using Sentinel-1A/1B satellite is effective in mapping glacier flow velocities with high-resolution and detailed information.
Glacier velocity is an important parameter to characterize glacier dynamics and to derive ice thickness and mass balance. The 2-pass/3-pass Differential Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry (DInSAR) techniques are advantageous in estimating glacier movements. However, the 2-pass DInSAR requires an external Digital Elevation Model (DEM), whereas the 3-pass DInSAR does not. The 3-pass DInSAR technique is adopted with Sentinel-1A/1B to map the Svalbard glacier flow velocities. Furthermore, the effect of glacier surface elevation change on the 2-pass DInSAR results were revealed by comparing glacier velocity with the two time period topographic information. The coherence indicates that Sentinel-1A/1B has a high potential to infer operational glacier velocity using the 3-pass DInSAR method with an average atmospheric uncertainty of 0.24 cm/day over the studied region. The precision of the 3-pass DInSAR is analyzed by comparing 2-pass derived line-of-sight (LOS) velocity on the same dates. The 3-pass DInSAR achieves high-resolution and detailed information.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据