4.7 Article

Influences of Landscape Configuration on River Water Quality

期刊

FORESTS
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f13020222

关键词

river water quality; chemical export coefficient; landscape configuration; landscape metrics

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study examined the impact of landscape configuration changes on river water quality in 31 catchments in the southwestern Caspian Sea basin. Different chemical exports showed seasonal variations, with permanently irrigated land leading to the disruption of broad-leaved forest and grassland ecosystems.
The present study investigated the effects of changes in landscape configuration on river water quality, which is calculated by chemical export coefficients, using spatial data onto 31 catchments in the southwestern part of the Caspian Sea basin by applying stepwise multivariate regression models. The water quality modeling has been carried out applying the chemical export coefficients of sulfate, bicarbonate, chlorine, calcium, magnesium, and sodium, and eight landscape metrics (including interspersion juxtaposition index, percentage of like adjacencies, aggregation index, clumpiness index, normalized landscape shape index, patch cohesion index, landscape division index, and splitting index), by which landscape configuration is analyzed. The results indicated that the sulfate (0.25 +/- 0.33 gr ha(-1)yr(-1)), bicarbonate (0.61 +/- 0.87 gr ha(-1) yr(-1)), chlorine (0.17 +/- 0.23 gr ha(-1) yr(-1)), calcium (0.16 +/- 0.21 gr ha(-1) yr(-1)), magnesium (0.05 +/- 0.07 gr ha(-1) yr(-1)), and sodium (0.16 +/- 0.21 gr ha(-1) yr(-1)) are annually exported from the study catchments into the rivers. The change in landscape configuration has significantly explained the chemical export coefficients of sulfate, bicarbonate, chlorine, calcium, magnesium, and sodium. The findings showed the cohesion and coherence of the permanently irrigated land patches resulting in the discontinuity of the broad-leaved forest and grassland ecosystems degraded river water quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据