4.7 Article

Characterisation of Moisture in Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) Sapwood Modified with Maleic Anhydride and Sodium Hypophosphite

期刊

FORESTS
卷 12, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f12101333

关键词

wood modification; maleic anhydride; sodium hypophosphite; moisture; deuterium exchange

类别

资金

  1. CT WOOD, a center of excellence at Lulea University of Technology
  2. short-term scientific mission of northern European network for wood science and engineering (WSE)
  3. Interreg Oresund-Kattegat-Skagerrak
  4. Czech Republic's funding office [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000803]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that in wood modified with maleic anhydride and sodium hypophosphite, the spin-spin relaxation time of cell wall water decreased, while the capillary water increased in the water-saturated state. The modified wood had lower moisture content and water content in cell walls compared to unmodified samples.
In this study, the wood-water interactions in Scots pine sapwood modified with maleic anhydride (MA) and sodium hypophosphite (SHP) was studied in the water-saturated state. The water in wood was studied with low field nuclear magnetic resonance (LFNMR) and the hydrophilicity of cell walls was studied by infrared spectroscopy after deuteration using liquid D2O. The results of LFNMR showed that the spin-spin relaxation (T-2) time of cell wall water decreased by modification, while T-2 of capillary water increased. Furthermore, the moisture content and the amount of water in cell walls of modified wood were lower than for unmodified samples at the water-saturated state. Although the amount of accessible hydroxyl groups in modified wood did not show any significant difference compared with unmodified wood, the increase in T-2 of capillary water indicates a decreased affinity of the wood cell wall to water. However, for the cell wall water, the physical confinement within the cell walls seemed to overrule the weaker wood-water interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据