4.3 Article

Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles and Incorporation to a Porous Nickel Electrode to Improve its Catalytic Performance Towards the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction

期刊

ELECTROCATALYSIS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 47-61

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12678-021-00690-7

关键词

Porous Ni electrodes; Au nanoparticles; Chemical synthesis; Hydrogen evolution reaction (HER); Catalysis

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional Ciencia y Tecnologia
  2. Consejo Potosino de Ciencia y Tecnologia [472041]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gold nanoparticles were synthesized and incorporated onto a porous Ni electrode to enhance its catalytic performance in the hydrogen evolution reaction, showing improvement mainly due to the intrinsic catalytic activity of the Au nanoparticles. The reaction mechanism was estimated to follow the Volmer-Heyrovsky mechanism based on Tafel representations and EIS results.
Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) were successfully synthesized by a facile chemical reduction method in the presence of the stabilizer polyvinylpyrrolidone and characterized by UV-vis spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy. The gold nanoparticles were then incorporated onto the surface of a porous Ni electrode by simple addition of the nanoparticles suspension, followed by heat treatment at 350 degrees C for 1 h under nitrogen atmosphere. The modified electrode was morphologically characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy. Then, the effect of the modification with Au nanoparticles was studied in the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) by pseudo-steady-state polarization curves and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), at different temperatures and compared with a pure porous Ni electrode. The modified electrode showed a clear improvement in its catalytic performance mainly due to the intrinsic catalytic activity of the Au nanoparticles. From the Tafel representations and the EIS, it was estimated that the HER on the electrode modified with AuNPs takes place by the Volmer-Heyrovsky mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据