4.8 Article

Genome-wide sequencing analysis of Sgs1, Exo1, Rad51, and Srs2 in DNA recombination

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 38, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110201

关键词

-

资金

  1. FEDER Una manera de hacer Europa'' [BFU2016-77081-P, PGC2018-097963-B-I00, BFU2017-89622-P]
  2. Junta y Castilla y Leon'' (Programa Escalera de Excelencia'' de la Junta de Castilla y Leon)
  3. Junta y Castilla y Leon'' (P.O. FEDER de Castilla y Leon 14-20) [CLU-2017-03]
  4. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad
  5. European Social Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study uses genome-wide sequencing to quantitatively analyze the dynamics of DNA end resection, re-synthesis, and gene conversion in homologous recombination. The findings reveal the involvement of different factors in regulating the rate and symmetry of DNA re-synthesis, and the independence of gene conversion from MMR.
Homologous recombination is essential to maintain genome stability in response to DNA damage. Here, we have used genome-wide sequencing to quantitatively analyze at nucleotide resolution the dynamics of DNA end resection, re-synthesis, and gene conversion at a double-strand break. Resection initiates asymmetrically in an MRX-independent manner before proceeding steadily in both directions. Sgs1, Exo1, Rad51, and Srs2 differently regulate the rate and symmetry of early and late resection. Exo1 also ensures the coexistence of resection and re-synthesis, while Srs2 guarantees a constant and symmetrical DNA re -polymerization. Gene conversion is MMR independent, spans only a minor fraction of the resected region, and its unidirectionality depends on Srs2. Finally, these repair factors prevent the development of alterations remote from the DNA lesion, such as subtelomeric instability, duplication of genomic regions, and over-replication of Ty elements. Altogether, this approach allows a quantitative analysis and a direct genome-wide visualization of DNA repair by homologous recombination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据