4.8 Article

A cell atlas of microbe-responsive processes in the zebrafish intestine

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 38, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110311

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [PJT 159604]
  3. Weston Family Microbiome Initiative
  4. University of Alberta Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research
  5. National Science and Engineering Research Council Graduate Scholarships
  6. Alberta Innovates Graduate Student Scholarships
  7. Faculty of Medicine Dentistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides insights into the cellular responses of zebrafish larvae to the microbiome by profiling cell transcriptomes. It reveals extensive cellular heterogeneity in the zebrafish intestinal epithelium and uncovers the effects of the microbiome on transcriptional activity in different cell populations.
Gut microbial products direct growth, differentiation, and development in animal hosts. However, we lack system-wide understanding of cell-specific responses to the microbiome. We profiled cell transcriptomes from the intestine, and associated tissue, of zebrafish larvae raised in the presence or absence of a micro biome. We uncovered extensive cellular heterogeneity in the conventional zebrafish intestinal epithelium, including previously undescribed cell types with known mammalian homologs. By comparing conventional to germ-free profiles, we mapped microbial impacts on transcriptional activity in each cell population. We revealed intricate degrees of cellular specificity in host responses to the microbiome that included regulatory effects on patterning and on metabolic and immune activity. For example, we showed that the absence of microbes hindered pro-angiogenic signals in the developing vasculature, causing impaired intestinal vascularization. Our work provides a high-resolution atlas of intestinal cellular composition in the developing fish gut and details the effects of the microbiome on each cell type.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据