4.8 Article

Purkinje cells translate subjective salience into readiness to act and choice performance

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 37, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110116

关键词

-

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO-ALW)
  2. Dutch Organization for Medical Sciences (ZonMW)
  3. BIG
  4. Medical Neuro-Delta
  5. INTENSE LSH-NWO
  6. ERC
  7. Van Raamsdonk-fonds
  8. 3V-Fonds KNAW
  9. Albinism Fonds NIN
  10. Health Holland [TKI-LSH LSHM18001, TKI-LSH EMCLSH21017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that cerebellar Purkinje cells can encode information about the selection of sensory inputs and contribute to non-motor forms of learning. Changes in complex spike activity instruct potentiation of Purkinje cells simple spike firing, which is necessary for efficient learning. Climbing fibers do not directly guide motor output during learning, but rather contribute to a general readiness to act via changes in simple spike activity, bridging the sequence from non-motor to motor functions.
The brain selectively allocates attention from a continuous stream of sensory input. This process is typically attributed to computations in distinct regions of the forebrain and midbrain. Here, we explore whether cerebellar Purkinje cells encode information about the selection of sensory inputs and could thereby contribute to non-motor forms of learning. We show that complex spikes of individual Purkinje cells change the sensory modality they encode to reflect changes in the perceived salience of sensory input. Comparisons with mouse models deficient in cerebellar plasticity suggest that changes in complex spike activity instruct potentiation of Purkinje cells simple spike firing, which is required for efficient learning. Our findings suggest that during learning, climbing fibers do not directly guide motor output, but rather contribute to a general readiness to act via changes in simple spike activity, thereby bridging the sequence from non-motor to motor functions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据