4.8 Article

Sodium-calcium exchanger mediates sensory-evoked glial calcium transients in the developing retinotectal system

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109791

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Fonds de recherche sante Quebec [31036]
  3. Brain Canada Canadian Neurophotonics Platform
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [FDN-143238]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During early development of the Xenopus laevis visual system, radial astrocytes in the optic tectum are highly responsive to sensory stimulation, with visual stimulation driving temporally correlated increases in the activity patterns of neighboring radial astrocytes. The blockade of glutamate transporters or sodium-calcium exchangers (NCX) abolishes visually evoked responses in glia, highlighting a pivotal role for NCX in glia during development.
Various types of sensory stimuli have been shown to induce Ca2+ elevations in glia. However, a mechanistic understanding of the signaling pathways mediating sensory-evoked activity in glia in intact animals is still emerging. During early development of the Xenopus laevis visual system, radial astrocytes in the optic tectum are highly responsive to sensory stimulation. Ca2+ transients occur spontaneously in radial astrocytes at rest and are abolished by silencing neuronal activity with tetrodotoxin. Visual stimulation drives temporally correlated increases in the activity patterns of neighboring radial astrocytes. Following blockade of all glutamate receptors (gluRs), visually evoked Ca2+ activity in radial astrocytes persists, while neuronal activity is suppressed. The additional blockade of either glu transporters or sodium-calcium exchangers (NCX) abolishes visually evoked responses in glia. Finally, we demonstrate that blockade of NCX alone is sufficient to prevent visually evoked responses in radial astrocytes, highlighting a pivotal role for NCX in glia during development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据