4.8 Article

Neurexin-3 defines synapse- and sex-dependent diversity of GABAergic inhibition in ventral subiculum

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 37, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110098

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R00MH103531, R01MH116901, R35NS116879, T32NS099042, 1F31MH125510]
  2. Brain & Behavior Research Foundation [NARSAD24847]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (Switzerland) [CRETP3_166815]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [CRETP3_166815] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals multiple roles for Nrxn3 at GABAergic synapses in vSUB, showing sexually dimorphic intrinsic connectivity and synaptic function. While PVs preferentially contact RS neurons in male mice, they favor BS neurons in female mice. Nrxn3 knockout affects synapse density and postsynaptic strength in males, but enhances presynaptic release in females.
Ventral subiculum (vSUB) is integral to the regulation of stress and reward; however, the intrinsic connectivity and synaptic properties of the inhibitory local circuit are poorly understood. Neurexin-3 (Nrxn3) is highly expressed in hippocampal inhibitory neurons, but its function at inhibitory synapses has remained elusive. Using slice electrophysiology, imaging, and single-cell RNA sequencing, we identify multiple roles for Nrxn3 at GABAergic parvalbumin (PV) interneuron synapses made onto vSUB regular-spiking (RS) and burst-spiking (BS) principal neurons. Surprisingly, we find that intrinsic connectivity of vSUB and synaptic function of Nrxn3 in vSUB are sexually dimorphic. We reveal that PVs make preferential contact with RS neurons in male mice, but BS neurons in female mice. Furthermore, we determine that despite comparable Nrxn3 isoform expression in male and female PV neurons, Nrxn3 knockout impairs synapse density, postsynaptic strength, and inhibitory postsynaptic current (IPSC) amplitude at PV-RS synapses in males, but enhances presynaptic release and IPSC amplitude in females.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据