4.8 Article

Altered H3 histone acetylation impairs high-fidelity DNA repair to promote cerebellar degeneration in spinocerebellar ataxia type 7

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 37, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110062

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01 EY014061, R01 AG033082, K99 CA207729]
  2. Diabetes Research Center grant [P30 DK063491]
  3. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education [1303/MOB/IV/2015/0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inherited ataxia commonly involves a vulnerability to DNA damage. SCA7 is characterized by cerebellar and retinal degeneration due to polyglutamine expansion in ataxin-7 protein, which affects transcription by altering histone acetylation. Altered DNA repair function in SCA7 may lead to excessive DNA damage, resulting in neuron demise and highlighting DNA repair as a potential therapy target.
A common mechanism in inherited ataxia is a vulnerability of DNA damage. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 7 (SCA7) is a CAG-polyglutamine-repeat disorder characterized by cerebellar and retinal degeneration. Polyglutamine-expanded ataxin-7 protein incorporates into STAGA co-activator complex and interferes with transcription by altering histone acetylation. We performed chromatic immunoprecipitation sequencing ChIP-seq on cerebellum from SCA7 mice and observed increased H3K9-promoter acetylation in DNA repair genes, resulting in increased expression. After detecting increased DNA damage in SCA7 cells, mouse primary cerebellar neurons, and patient stem-cell-derived neurons, we documented reduced homology directed repair (HDR) and single-strand annealing (SSA). To evaluate repair at endogenous DNA in native chromosome context, we modified linear amplification-mediated high-throughput genome-wide translocation sequencing and found that DNA translocations are less frequent in SCA7 models, consistent with decreased HDR and SSA. Altered DNA repair function in SCA7 may predispose the subject to excessive DNA damage, leading to neuron demise and highlights DNA repair as a therapy target.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据