4.8 Article

Loss of FBXO31-mediated degradation of DUSP6 dysregulates ERK and PI3K-AKT signaling and promotes prostate tumorigenesis

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 37, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109870

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [R01-CA76584, R35-GM136250]
  2. National Institute of Health Training Program in Molecular Oncology and Tumor Immunology [2T32CA009161]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

FBXO31 acts as a tumor suppressor by promoting the degradation of DUSP6 and inhibiting ERK signaling while activating PI3K-AKT signaling. Deletion of FBXO31 enhances tumor development in prostate cancer models, but treatment with a small molecule inhibitor of DUSP6 can prevent tumor formation by suppressing AKT activation. These findings highlight the importance of the FBXO31-DUSP6 axis in regulating signaling pathways and its potential therapeutic implications in prostate cancer.
FBXO31 is the substrate receptor of one of many CUL1-RING ubiquitin ligase (CRL1) complexes. Here, we show that low FBXO31 mRNA levels are associated with high pre-operative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and Gleason grade in human prostate cancer. Mechanistically, the ubiquitin ligase CRL1FBXO31 promotes the ubiquitylation-mediated degradation of DUSP6, a dual specificity phosphatase that dephosphorylates and inactivates the extracellular-signal-regulated kinase-1 and -2 (ERK1/2). Depletion of FBXO31 stabilizes DUSP6, suppresses ERK signaling, and activates the PI3K-AKT signaling cascade. Moreover, deletion of FBXO31 promotes tumor development in a mouse orthotopic model of prostate cancer. Treatment with BCI, a small molecule inhibitor of DUSP6, suppresses AKT activation and prevents tumor formation, suggesting that the FBXO31 tumor suppressor activity is dependent on DUSP6. Taken together, our studies highlight the relevance of the FBXO31-DUSP6 axis in the regulation of ERK- and PI3K-AKT-mediated signaling pathways, as well as its therapeutic potential in prostate cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据