4.8 Article

Direct and indirect pathway neurons in ventrolateral striatum differentially regulate licking movement and nigral responses

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 37, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109847

关键词

-

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB32010200]
  2. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project [2018SHZDZX05]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31771151, 32171030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that in rodents, inactivation of D1 and D2 receptor-expressing medium spiny neurons (MSNs) in the ventrolateral striatum (VLS) oppositely alters the number of licks in a bout. D1-MSNs and D2-MSNs exhibit different patterns of activity related to licking sequences and have different phases of oscillation time-locked to the lick cycle. Distinct roles of D1-MSNs and D2-MSNs in regulating licking behavior at both coarse and fine timescales were demonstrated.
Drinking behavior in rodents is characterized by stereotyped, rhythmic licking movement, which is regulated by the basal ganglia. It is unclear how direct and indirect pathways control the lick bout and individual spout contact. We find that inactivating D1 and D2 receptor-expressing medium spiny neurons (MSNs) in the ventrolateral striatum(VLS) oppositely alters the number of licks in a bout. D1- and D2-MSNs exhibit different patterns of lick-sequence-related activity and different phases of oscillation time-locked to the lick cycle. On the timescale of a lick cycle, transient inactivation of D1-MSNs during tongue protrusion reduces spout contact probability, whereas transiently inactivating D2-MSNs has no effect. On the timescale of a lick bout, inactivation of D1-MSNs (D2-MSNs) causes rate increase (decrease) in a subset of basal ganglia output neurons that decrease firing during licking. Our results reveal the distinct roles of D1- and D2-MSNs in regulating licking at both coarse and fine timescales.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据