4.8 Article

SIX1 reprograms myogenic transcription factors to maintain the rhabdomyosarcoma undifferentiated state

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 38, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110323

关键词

-

资金

  1. Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation Innovation Award [R21CA201809, R01CA224867, R01CA183874, GM117964, NS098780, K08CA245251]
  2. CU Cancer Center Molecular and Cellular Oncology Pilot Grant [P30CA046934, T32GM763538, TL1TR001081]
  3. NIH/NCI [P30CA021765]
  4. CureSearch for the Children's Cancer Foundation
  5. Rally Foundation for Childhood Cancer Research
  6. American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities
  7. University of Maine start-up fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the crucial role of SIX1 in maintaining the undifferentiated state of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and inhibiting tumor growth. SIX1 controls enhancer activity and MYOD1 occupancy at specific loci to preserve the undifferentiated state of RMS cells.
Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a pediatric muscle sarcoma characterized by expression of the myogenic lineage transcription factors (TFs) MYOD1 and MYOG. Despite high expression of these TFs, RMS cells fail to terminally differentiate, suggesting the presence of factors that alter their functions. Here, we demonstrate that the developmental TF SIX1 is highly expressed in RMS and critical for maintaining a muscle progenitor-like state. SIX1 loss induces differentiation of RMS cells into myotube-like cells and impedes tumor growth in vivo. We show that SIX1 maintains the RMS undifferentiated state by controlling enhancer activity and MYOD1 occupancy at loci more permissive to tumor growth over muscle differentiation. Finally, we demonstrate that a gene signature derived from SIX1 loss correlates with differentiation status and predicts RMS progression in human disease. Our findings demonstrate a master regulatory role of SIX1 in repression of RMS differentiation via genome-wide alterations in MYOD1 and MYOG-mediated transcription.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据