4.6 Article

Recovery, rehabilitation and follow-up services following critical illness: an updated UK national cross-sectional survey and progress report

期刊

BMJ OPEN
卷 11, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052214

关键词

adult intensive & critical care; rehabilitation medicine

资金

  1. Healthcare Improvement Studies (THIS) Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK [PD-2019-02-16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study surveyed the provision of recovery, rehabilitation and follow-up services for adult critical care patients in the UK, with findings showing that inpatient and outpatient services were mainly delivered by nurses and co-delivered by two or more healthcare professionals. Lack of funding was identified as a primary barrier to service provision, with post-hospital discharge physical rehabilitation programs being relatively few but peer support services being more available. The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in changes in service provision, with future plans focusing on expanding current outpatient services.
Objective To comprehensively update and survey the current provision of recovery, rehabilitation and follow-up services for adult critical care patients across the UK. Design Cross-sectional, self-administered, predominantly closed-question, electronic, online survey. Setting Institutions providing adult critical care services identified from national databases. Participants Multiprofessional critical care clinicians delivering services at each site. Results Responses from 176 UK hospital sites were included (176/242, 72.7%). Inpatient recovery and follow-up services were present at 127/176 (72.2%) sites, adopting multiple formats of delivery and primarily delivered by nurses (n=115/127, 90.6%). Outpatient services ran at 130 sites (73.9%), predominantly as outpatient clinics. Most services (n=108/130, 83.1%) were co-delivered by two or more healthcare professionals, typically nurse/intensive care unit (ICU) physician (n=29/130, 22.3%) or nurse/ICU physician/physiotherapist (n=19/130, 14.6%) teams. Clinical psychology was most frequently lacking from inpatient or outpatient services. Lack of funding was consistently the primary barrier to service provision, with other barriers including logistical and service prioritisation factors indicating that infrastructure and profile for services remain inadequate. Posthospital discharge physical rehabilitation programmes were relatively few (n=31/176, 17.6%), but peer support services were available in nearly half of responding institutions (n=85/176, 48.3%). The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in either increasing, decreasing or reformatting service provision. Future plans for long-term service transformation focus on expansion of current, and establishment of new, outpatient services. Conclusion Overall, these data demonstrate a proliferation of recovery, follow-up and rehabilitation services for critically ill adults in the past decade across the UK, although service gaps remain suggesting further work is required for guideline implementation. Findings can be used to enhance survivorship for critically ill adults, inform policymakers and commissioners, and provide comparative data and experiential insights for clinicians designing models of care in international healthcare jurisdictions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据