4.5 Article

High intensity interval training versus moderate intensity continuous training for people with interstitial lung disease: protocol for a randomised controlled trial

期刊

BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-021-01704-2

关键词

Interstitial lung diseases; Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; Pulmonary Fibrosis; Exercise; Rehabilitation; High-Intensity interval training; Endurance training

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre of Research Excellence in Pulmonary Fibrosis
  2. Institute for Breathing and Sleep
  3. Lung Foundation Australia (Lizotte Family Grant)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to compare the clinical benefits of high intensity interval exercise training versus standard pulmonary rehabilitation method in fibrotic interstitial lung disease patients. The primary outcome is endurance time, with secondary outcomes including functional capacity, health-related quality of life, breathlessness, fatigue, anxiety, physical activity level, skeletal muscle changes, and completion of pulmonary rehabilitation programs.
Background Interstitial lung disease is a debilitating condition associated with significant dyspnoea, fatigue, and poor exercise tolerance. Pulmonary rehabilitation is an effective and key intervention in people with interstitial lung disease. However, despite the best efforts of patients and clinicians, many of those who participate are not achieving clinically meaningful benefits. This assessor-blinded, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial aims to compare the clinical benefits of high intensity interval exercise training versus the standard pulmonary rehabilitation method of continuous training at moderate intensity in people with fibrotic interstitial lung disease. Methods Eligible participants will be randomised to either a standard pulmonary rehabilitation group using moderate intensity continuous exercise training or high intensity interval exercise training. Participants in both groups will undertake an 8-week pulmonary rehabilitation program of twice-weekly supervised exercise training including aerobic (cycling) and strengthening exercises. In addition, participants in both groups will be prescribed a home exercise program. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, upon completion of the intervention and at six months following the intervention by a blinded assessor. The primary outcome is endurance time on a constant work rate test. Secondary outcomes are functional capacity (6-min walk distance), health-related quality of life (Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis specific version (SGRQ-I), breathlessness (Dyspnoea 12, Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale), fatigue (fatigue severity scale), anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), physical activity level (GeneActiv), skeletal muscle changes (ultrasonography) and completion and adherence to pulmonary rehabilitation. Discussion The standard exercise training strategies used in pulmonary rehabilitation may not provide an optimal exercise training stimulus for people with interstitial lung disease. This study will determine whether high intensity interval training can produce equivalent or even superior changes in exercise performance and symptoms. If high intensity interval training proves effective, it will provide an exercise training strategy that can readily be implemented into clinical practice for people with interstitial lung disease. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT03800914). Registered 11 January 2019, Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619000019101. Registered 9 January 2019,

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据