LMA® protector™ in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries: a multicenter prospective observational study

Background: Laryngeal masks airway (LMA) has been increasingly used in surgical patients. However, the use of LMA in laparoscopic surgeries remains controversial. The major concerns include the potential risk of esophageal regurgitation, aspiration, and difficulties to achieve effective ventilation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the LMA (R) Protector (TM) in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Methods: Patients aged 18 to 70 years, scheduled for laparoscopic surgeries were included. The insertion time, successful insertion rate, and oropharyngeal leak pressure were measured. Airway complications and airway manipulations during the procedure were documented. Effective ventilation rate was calculated. Visible bloodstains and reflux content in the drainage channel were documented after the removal of LMA (R) Protector (TM). Results: Three hundred patients were enrolled. The insertion of LMA (R) Protector (TM) failed in seven patients resulting with a successful insertion rate of 97.7%. During the maintenance of anesthesia, airway manipulation was required in 19 patients (19/293, 6.48%), in three of whom the LMA was replaced with endotracheal intubation resulting with an effective ventilation rate of 96.7% (290/300). The oropharyngeal leak pressure was 30.18 +/- 5.88 cmH(2)O. Seventy-five patients (25.86%) reported mild sore throat on the first day after surgery. Bloodstains on study devices were noticed in 58 patients (20%). Seventy-five patients (25.86%) reported mild sore throat on the first day after surgery. Gastric reflux was noticed in the drainage tube in 5 patients (1.72%) with no signs of aspiration in any of those patients. Conclusions: The LMA (R) Protector (TM) was shown to be safe and effective in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries. Although minor complications that require no further treatment, no clinically diagnosed aspiration was noticed in our study. Gastric reflux was noticed in the drainage tube in five patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecology surgery. Further research is needed to verify whether LMA (R) Protector (TM) is suitable for procedures in Trendelenburg position or other situations that a high risk of gastroesophageal reflux exists.

Automated summary

The study showed that LMA (R) Protector (TM) is safe and effective in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries. Minor complications were observed, but no clinically diagnosed aspiration was reported. Further research is needed to determine if LMA (R) Protector (TM) is suitable for procedures in Trendelenburg position or other situations with a high risk of gastroesophageal reflux.