4.4 Article

Analysis of underwater plasma discharge based on equivalent circuit parameters

期刊

AIP ADVANCES
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0074563

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the RLC parameters of the underwater discharge system and their equivalent circuit, illustrating the relationship between the parameters and discharge modes and energy. The analysis shows that the relative relationship of system equivalent RLC parameters determines the discharge mode, while impedance matching between the discharge channel and external circuit determines discharge energy.
The control of discharge mode and the optimization of energy efficiency are of particular concern as the significant impact on the application of the underwater plasma discharge system. In this paper, the RLC parameters of each part of the underwater discharge system are investigated, and the equivalent circuit is obtained. Typical waveforms of current and voltage for different underwater discharge modes are displayed. The correlation between the equivalent RLC parameters of the discharge system and the discharge modes and energy is illustrated. The equivalent circuit of the underwater plasma discharge system is utilized to analyze the effects of the power source, electrode, and liquid dielectric parameters. The influences of these parameters can be identical to the impacts on the RLC parameters of the underwater discharge system equivalent circuit simultaneously, and then, the effects on the discharge modes and energy can be better understood. It can be concluded that the relative relationship of system equivalent RLC parameters determines the discharge mode, and the impedance matching between the discharge channel and the external circuit determines the discharge energy. (c) 2021 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据